Michael Stephens of Tame the Web is a blogger whose writing and insight I admire tremendously. He's a tech librarian's tech librarian. His November 25 post, Suggestions for Upgrading to Library 2.0 (or Some Easy Steps to Get Started...Really) bathroom makeover contest ad me cheering all the way through until the end, when I finally reflected on the situation in most libraries, and wept quietly into my hands. There have been a lot of Library 2.0 posts lately, but it was Michael's specific suggestions that prompted me to step in with my in-the-trenches perspective. There isn't a thing wrong with Michael's suggestions, provided that you are person who can affect such change, or work in a wonderfully collaborative environment. We all know about the socioeconomic digital divide, but there's an in-house version of the divide. Most of us need not look any further than our own work places to find it. It's a cleft kept wedged apart by territoriality, fear, ignorance, and resistance to change. Maybe a more accurate model would be one of those Antarctic ice shelves that used to be a cohesive, identifiable land mass, but breaks up into various, drifting chunks (a penguin here, a penguin there...how will they ever connect again? If only the penguins had IM!) I'm going to go through Michael's points and explain why his vision is very Pie-in-the-Sky for many of us. That said, I'm thankful to Michael and all the other Pie-in-the-Skyers. It gives the rest of us hope and something to strive for.

Yes, it is indeed 2am. Yes, I am sitting here at my computer. Sometimes things won't wait. Today I read an interesting...oh, let's call it an assumption, for lack of a better term. The assumption was that by fearing death, by crying out, begging or perhaps even fighting for our lives, we are not truly saved. In a nutshell, a love of life, means that we are perhaps not really Christians, not really assured of what is yet to come. I was bothered by this, but I couldn't really put my finger on what it was that bothered me. I didn't know if it was the hypothesis itself, the arrogance of assuming that any human being can determine the salvation of another, especially based upon a person's behavior in the most extreme situation imaginable, or simply the pervasive taste that simply because we are Christians we ought to welcome death with open arms. A while ago I blogged a little conversation between my daughter and her friend. I am going to restate it here: Kaitlyn: It doesn't really matter if you die because it's like all of the sudden you wake up and before you know it, everyone you love is there. Lindsay: I just hope it doesn't hurt. And that is it in a nutshell, don't you think? Two little girls, both raised to know Christ, both fully aware of what is going to happen after death (albeit simplistically), cashback credit cards uk o fear whatsoever of what comes after. But we sure hope it doesn't hurt. It's the process of dying that scares us. We all imagine the most perfect scenario.

Lizz Sims, a women's accessory boutique, opened last Monday in the Washington three credit report own Center in Washington Township. The store carries jewelry, belts, hats, hair accessories, bags, and aromatherapy products. Pictured at left are Terry Stack interchangable belts, which are carried by the store. Owner Jennifer Kim of Cresskill says that the store is part of the Anna Sims chain, but slightly more upscale. It's located near the A&P. Through June, take 10% off all of the store's merchandise. Also worth noting: the movie theater has reopened after a renovation. The Record visited Nicola Boutique , located near the movie theater, in February. Store hours are 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through Saturday. Photo credit: terrystack.com

Yes, it is indeed 2am. Yes, I am sitting here at my computer. Sometimes things won't wait. Today I read an interesting...oh, let's call it an assumption, for lack of a better term. The assumption was that by fearing death, by crying out, begging or perhaps even fighting for our lives, we are not truly saved. In a nutshell, a love of life, means that we are perhaps not really Christians, not really assured of what is yet to come. I was bothered by this, but I couldn't really put my finger on what it was that bothered me. I didn't know if it was the hypothesis itself, the arrogance of assuming that any human being can determine the salvation of another, especially based upon a person's behavior in the most extreme situation imaginable, or simply the pervasive taste that simply because we are Christians we ought to welcome death with open arms. A while ago I blogged a little conversation between my daughter and her friend. I am going to restate it here: Kaitlyn: It doesn't really matter if you die because it's like all of the sudden you wake up and before you know it, everyone you love is there. Lindsay: I just hope it doesn't hurt. And that is it in a nutshell, don't you think? Two little girls, both raised to know Christ, both fully aware of what is going to happen after death (albeit simplistically), no fear whatsoever of what comes after. But we sure hope it doesn't Denon AVR1705 urt. It's the process of dying that scares us. We all imagine the most perfect scenario.

I stole this from my niece's pathetic weblog, which she never updates. I've decided that I will harass her until that whole side of my family doesn't talk to me. It'll save email marketing tool e a bundle on Christmas cards.

Michael Stephens of Tame the Web is a blogger whose writing and insight I admire tremendously. He's a tech librarian's tech librarian. His November 25 post, Suggestions for Upgrading to Library 2.0 (or Some Easy Steps to Get Started...Really) had me cheering all the way through until the end, when I finally reflected on q link he situation in most libraries, and wept quietly into my hands. There have been a lot of Library 2.0 posts lately, but it was Michael's specific suggestions that prompted me to step in with my in-the-trenches perspective. There isn't a thing wrong with Michael's suggestions, provided that you are person who can affect such change, or work in a wonderfully collaborative environment. We all know about the socioeconomic digital divide, but there's an in-house version of the divide. Most of us need not look any further than our own work places to find it. It's a cleft kept wedged apart by territoriality, fear, ignorance, and resistance to change. Maybe a more accurate model would be one of those Antarctic ice shelves that used to be a cohesive, identifiable land mass, but breaks up into various, drifting chunks (a penguin here, a penguin there...how will they ever connect again? If only the penguins had IM!) I'm going to go through Michael's points and explain why his vision is very Pie-in-the-Sky for many of us. That said, I'm thankful to Michael and all the other Pie-in-the-Skyers. It gives the rest of us hope and something to strive for.

Michael Stephens of Tame the Web is a blogger whose writing and insight I admire tremendously. He's a tech librarian's tech librarian. His November 25 post, Suggestions for Upgrading to Library 2.0 (or Some Easy Steps to Get Started...Really) had me cheering all the way through until the end, when I finally reflected on the situation in most libraries, and wept quietly into my hands. There have been a lot of Library 2.0 posts lately, but it was Michael's specific suggestions that prompted me to step in with my in-the-trenches perspective. There isn't a thing wrong with Michael's suggestions, provided that you are person who can affect such change, or work in a wonderfully collaborative environment. We all know about the socioeconomic digital divide, but there's an in-house version of the divide. Most of us need not look any further than our own work places to find it. It's a cleft kept wedged apart by territoriality, fear, ignorance, and resistance to change. Maybe a more accurate model would be one of those Antarctic ice shelves that used to be a cohesive, identifiable land mass, but breaks up into various, drifting chunks (a penguin here, a penguin there...how will they ever connect again? If only the penguins had IM!) I'm going to go through Michael's points and explain why his vision is very Pie-in-the-Sky for many of us. That said, I'm thankful to Michael and all the other Pie-in-the-Skyers. It gives the rest of us hope and something to strive handicap ramp design or.

Paul Henderson has selected the paperbacks due to come out in the UK in the second half of 2007 that he thinks will sell the best (Bookseller's Paperback Preview, Autumn). He defines "giant" as a book that will be in the top 100 paperbacks of the year and sell more than 100,000 copies (total consumer market); "bestseller" as in the top 10 for at least a week and sell more than 50,000; "bubbling under" as not quite top 10 but selling around 30,000; and a few "breakthroughs", either an author who is making a mark or one who is selling at a higher level than previously. He points out that his predictions are by volume, so he hasn't included books from many small publishers. He also made his selection before the Richard and Judy summer reads were announced, which will have a huge effect -- last year's six sold 2.5 million between them and were in the charts for many weeks. I am picking out just a few of Paul's selections that I recommend, either because I've read them already or because they are on my list to be read, or because they just look good. July Giants: The Naming of the Dead by Ian Rankin It's Rebus, possibly for the last time (I don't believe that myself, but others do). Can't wait. One Good Turn by Kate Atkinson A second outing for Jackson Brodie of Case Histories. Being repackaged to look nasdaq stock quotes ore like a crime novel. Bubbling under: In the Evil Day by Peter Temple. A standalone, not a Jack Irish novel. August Giants: Atonement by Ian McEwan . His masterpiece.

Michael Stephens of Tame the Web is a blogger whose writing and insight I admire tremendously. He's a tech librarian's tech librarian. His November 25 post, Suggestions for Upgrading to Library 2.0 (or Some Easy Steps to Get Started...Really) had me cheering all the way through until the end, when I finally reflected on the situation in most libraries, and wept quietly into my hands. There have been a lot of Library 2.0 posts lately, but it was Michael's specific suggestions that prompted me to step in with my in-the-trenches perspective. There isn't a thing wrong with Michael's suggestions, provided that you are person who can affect such change, or work in a wonderfully collaborative environment. We all know about the socioeconomic digital divide, but there's an in-house version of the divide. Most of us need not look any further than our own work places to debt settlement programs ind it. It's a cleft kept wedged apart by territoriality, fear, ignorance, and resistance to change. Maybe a more accurate model would be one of those Antarctic ice shelves that used to be a cohesive, identifiable land mass, but breaks up into various, drifting chunks (a penguin here, a penguin there...how will they ever connect again? If only the penguins had IM!) I'm going to go through Michael's points and explain why his vision is very Pie-in-the-Sky for many of us. That said, I'm thankful to Michael and all the other Pie-in-the-Skyers. It gives the rest of us hope and something to strive for.

Paul Henderson has selected the paperbacks due to come out in the UK in the second half of 2007 that he thinks will sell the best (Bookseller's Paperback Preview, Autumn). He defines "giant" as a book that will be in the top 100 paperbacks of the year and sell more than 100,000 copies (total consumer market); "bestseller" as in the top 10 for at least a week and sell more than 50,000; "bubbling under" as not quite top 10 but selling around 30,000; and a few "breakthroughs", either an author slim shady clothing ho is making a mark or one who is selling at a higher level than previously. He points out that his predictions are by volume, so he hasn't included books from many small publishers. He also made his selection before the Richard and Judy summer reads were announced, which will have a huge effect -- last year's six sold 2.5 million between them and were in the charts for many weeks. I am picking out just a few of Paul's selections that I recommend, either because I've read them already or because they are on my list to be read, or because they just look good. July Giants: The Naming of the Dead by Ian Rankin It's Rebus, possibly for the last time (I don't believe that myself, but others do). Can't wait. One Good Turn by Kate Atkinson A second outing for Jackson Brodie of Case Histories. Being repackaged to look more like a crime novel. Bubbling under: In the Evil Day by Peter Temple. A standalone, not a Jack Irish novel. August Giants: Atonement by Ian McEwan . His masterpiece.

Click Here

Yes, it is indeed 2am. Yes, I am sitting here at my computer. Sometimes things won't wait. Today I read an interesting...oh, let's call it an assumption, for lack of a better term. The assumption was that by fearing death, by crying out, begging or perhaps even fighting for our lives, we are not truly saved. In a nutshell, a love of life, means that we are perhaps not really Christians, not really assured of what is yet to come. I was bothered by this, but I couldn't really put my finger on what it was that bothered me. I didn't know if it was the hypothesis itself, the arrogance of assuming that any human being can determine the salvation of another, especially based upon a person's behavior in the most extreme situation imaginable, or simply the pervasive taste that simply because more stamina e are Christians we ought to welcome death with open arms. A while ago I blogged a little conversation between my daughter and her friend. I am going to restate it here: Kaitlyn: It doesn't really matter if you die because it's like all of the sudden you wake up and before you know it, everyone you love is there. Lindsay: I just hope it doesn't hurt. And that is it in a nutshell, don't you think? Two little girls, both raised to know Christ, both fully aware of what is going to happen after death (albeit simplistically), no fear whatsoever of what comes after. But we sure hope it doesn't hurt. It's the process of dying that scares us. We all imagine the most perfect scenario.

Michael Stephens of Tame the Web is a blogger whose writing and insight I admire tremendously. He's a tech librarian's tech librarian. His November 25 post, Suggestions for Upgrading to Library 2.0 (or Some Easy Steps to Get Started...Really) had me cheering all the way through until the end, when I finally reflected on the situation in most libraries, and wept quietly into my hands. There have been a lot of Library 2.0 posts lately, but it was Michael's specific suggestions that prompted me to step in with my in-the-trenches perspective. There isn't a thing wrong with Michael's suggestions, provided that you are person who can affect such change, or work in a wonderfully collaborative environment. We all know about the socioeconomic digital divide, but there's an in-house version of the divide. Most of us need not look any further than our own work places to find it. It's a cleft kept wedged apart by territoriality, fear, ignorance, vampires nd resistance to change. Maybe a more accurate model would be one of those Antarctic ice shelves that used to be a cohesive, identifiable land mass, but breaks up into various, drifting chunks (a penguin here, a penguin there...how will they ever connect again? If only the penguins had IM!) I'm going to go through Michael's points and explain why his vision is very Pie-in-the-Sky for many of us. That said, I'm thankful to Michael and all the other Pie-in-the-Skyers. It gives the rest of us hope and something to strive for.